Sunday, October 14, 2012

The Sure Thing That Nobody Plays

This is a parable that shows a TRUE concept of Investment ... 


David Dreman's 
The Sure Thing That Nobody Plays



 Imagine you are entering a deluxe, well-  appointed casino.





Off the lavish entry foyer, there are two ample gambling wings, one hued in reds, the other in muted greens. The red wing looks enticing, but if I may insist, let's first enter the less crowded green rooms to watch the action. 




The atmosphere is unhurried, the blackjack tables are sparsely attended, and every player sits behind a mound of green and black chips. You think at first you've come to the wrong place. You see the ordinary table limits, the ordinary clothes, the ordinary games. But then how did these ordinary people get such piles of money?

Then it comes to you. They're all winning. In fact, as you walk
 around the green wing, you hardly can find a losing player. You know, of course, that the average house take on table games is 5%, but as you count winning and losing hands, you realize these players are getting a better break. They seem to be gaining at a rate of 60% to 40%. You start fresh and take another count. The results are the same. 

A pit boss appears at your shoulder. 

"Excuse me," you say, "but can this be right? The odds favor the players?" 

"Yes, indeed. The odds in the green room usually run 60 to 40. It's been that way since we opened." 


"But...most of the players must go away winners." 


"They sure do. At those odds, we calculate that 9,999 out of
 10,000 make money. At our high-stakes tables in the back, they do even better, with winners running about 20,000 to 1. It's a good thing we get so few players, or they'd break the house." 



 In short , in the green wing …….


Somewhat amazed, you thank him and shake your head. There's no time to lose, you decide, but you'll need more than the few dollars you have in your pocket. You hatch a plan to gather your life savings, come back to the casino, and win the bundle you've been dreaming of. 


On your way out, you glance into the red wing. The action level is much, much higher. The room is crowded and fairly roars with excitement. Can it be even better here, you wonder? Curious, you go in. Players bet multiple table positions, wave frantically for change, entreat the gods for luck. You see few green and black chips, fewer winning players. The piles of chips in front of them are dwindling with each hand. In fact, the odds are worse than normal. Again, you start to count. Although the players continue to excitedly toss in their chips, the odds appear to be maybe 60 to 40 in favor of the house. Once more, your curiosity whetted, you walk over to a pit boss and ask her the odds at these tables. 

She tells you what you suspected. They are 60 to 40 in favor
 of the casino. Warming up to the subject, she chuckles and says, "This room coins gold for the casino, the chances are 9,999 in 10,000 rounds that we wind up winners." You don't have to be a genius to see that this is obviously not the place you want to be. 

.This wing is the complete opposite of the other. It favors the house … therefore,

You go home and get your stash. You return to the casino with your fistful of money, excited, eager for action, all the time figuring how you'll do even better at the game. 




But then a strange thing happens. You walk into the red wing and start to play.




The concept shown in this parable is ... RISK! In investing, like gambling, risks are always there. All of us, no matter what we do, we'd like a challenge. That's where that "thrill"comes in. For example, would you be interested in a class where you're the only one who excels No. You'd rather risk your class standing in a class full of competent students. Risks/ challenges pushes us to do our best. BUT! We must also remember, that in investing, no matter what kind, we should always think of and plan what were going to do. Risks are fun but we also expect better results. 



The Fruit Pickers Under the Mango Tree


This is the third and last painting analysis. My previous posts were about foreign painting, now let me present to you a local painting. :)


The Fruit Pickers Under the Mango Tree
Painted by Fernando Amorsolo





The artwork is entitled Fruit Pickers Under the Mango Tree. It was painted by Fernando Amorsolo a famous Filipino artist. It was made by using oil on 25 1/4 x 37 1/2 inches canvas and was finished at the year 1937.


As start, the painting consists of Filipino fruit harvesters. There are six of them - two at the left back side and four at right front. There is also a big mango tree in front and different sizes of baskets for the mangoes. One person, who has her back turned seems to be talking to the girl sitting. Others were totally engrossed to their work. The place is very bright as a green environment.


The artwork has a smooth texture, bright colors were often used than the dark ones. There were a lot of curved lines and very few straight lines. Also, the intensity of the painting is low due to light colors. It is not balanced: the right side has more weight than the left. Here, no spaces can be seen, everything has been filled and for that, there was no dull moment.


Fernando Amorsolo created this painting during the year 1937. This year was the rise of woman rights. Many events for the Filipinas occurred during that time. One, the Philippines held a plebiscite for Filipino women on whether they should be extended the right to suffrage; over 90% voted in the affirmative. Also, for the first ever,  Filipino women were given the right to vote during elections.

           
           He is also known for his illuminated landscapes which portrayed traditional Filipino customs, culture, fiestas and occupation. With this, he often paint Filipinas and shows their true beauty. He described Filipino women as having a rounded face, lively eyes and not the dreamy sleepy one; and having not a white nor dark-brown color, but a clear and fresh skin---an ideal Filipina beauty!

            
Two of the most distinctive features of his painting is the style of coloring and way of shading. The artwork also showed different principles of design. First, emphasis was especially given on one girl sitting under the tree. This was clearly shown because of the light that hits that particular object; The picture is not balanced: the right side has more weight than the left; Variety was not really given value in this artwork - almost all parts have the same stroke and manner. Movement among the characters can be seen – especially between the workers at the back; Different shades of light was obvious, and for that rhythm was visible; Lastly, it is harmonious and unified even though it is unbalanced. This gave the painting a more dramatic yet realistic effect.


             The artist, Amorsolo, created this artwork to show of the true value of Filipinos. They are hard-working yet happy of what they are doing. It was to also make the world aware about the true Filipina beauty. Overall, this painting was intended to show Filipino’s characteristic glow. This can be proven by looking at the characters in the painting. Not only that, taking a look back at the events proves it’s true meaning.


It is a very gorgeous artwork. For the criteria, we can say it’s the Technique, Meaning, Impact, and Theme. In my own judgement, I give it 9 for the technique; 10 for the Meaning; 8 for the Impact and 10 for the Theme.


For me, it is an artwork full of emotions for the beloved country and it’s citizens. I love how Amorsolo made it eye-catching. It is simple but a very gorgeous display of the characters. The way the mango tree was painted makes it significant for the whole work. The title is really fitting because It’s meaning can be easily interpreted by viewers and that is a good point. It means that Amorsolo reached out to touch hearts with painting.


Truly inspiring!

The Fountain of Pirene


In relation with my previous post, this is another painting analysis... by one of the most awesome painters I know, Maxfield Parrish



The Fountain of Pirene
Painted by Maxfield Parrish



                          
“The Fountain of Pirene” is the title of one of Maxfield Parrish’s myth paintings. It was created during the year 1907. It was made by using his famous blue color and glazing technique wherein bright layers of oil color separated by varnish are applied alternately over a base.


The painting has a three-dimensional effect. For the front, there were giant rocks to enclose the fountain of Pirene and two greek people talking. A mist also took effect. Two trees at the middle part – but the one at the right is closer to the viewers and has a different effect than that of the tree at the back. The back part shows a waterfall flowing non-stop from the top.


The form of art used here was painting, though a different way of doing it. The medium Parrish used here was oil and varnish. He also used the transparency of the photo and black graphite on the canvas so that he can trace the black portions of the photograph.


Different shapes and figures were used for this painting – the rocks, the waterfall etc. The axis of the painting is vertical due to the way he painted the tall trees and the flowing waterfall. Somehow, if the viewer will focus on the front only, it might be depicted as having a horizontal axis. The lines were soft for there is no really straight surface in the painting, more like, dots were used for the artwork.


The use of soft lines made the artwork look smooth, though at the same time, the use of dots for the last layer makes it look a bit rough. Here, dark colors were dominant than the bright but the way the bright colors were used makes it equal to the quantity of the dark. Also, the intensity of the painting is big because of the shading technique. Proper spacing was visible; everything has been filled and the picture is very calm yet there was no dull moment.


For schemes, Parrish used different tools. One, using a small palette knife, he proceeded to thin the paint to the proper transparency. Two, the glaze technique was applied by using a normal paintbrush creating shadows with the varnish. Three, he used a stipple brush to create smooth graduations between two colors. Four, he used a blotting paper for cliffs and rocks. Five, he frequently used cheesecloth which is for areas of glaze and to break up textures. Six, he used pencil knife for finer areas. This way of scheming was used layer after layer.


The place and time of the painting cannot be really determined for this is a Greek myth representation. It is a story about Pirene who became tears and turned to a fountain because of grief for her son’s death.

The most distinctive feature of this artwork is lighting and shading. Cool colors were used. It brings out the painting’s beauty. It also has a very nice flow of rhythm because of the way the water and the trees were painted.


Emphasis wasn’t really given to the main subject. Viewers might take the waterfall as the fountain because if a person looks at the painting, he/she will not look at what’s at the bottom but the middle. He/she will see the waterfall not the fountain. . The painting is very balanced: there were two people at the front right; a waterfall at left back; and trees on both sides. Harmony is very visible. The variety of the painting was shown: the rocks, the trees, the falls, the people. The movement is very relaxing and calm. It also has proportion, giving each object a chance to be noticed. Unity among the objects is very obvious when you look at the lighting effects. The way it was painted, makes it look realistic.


Maxfield Parrish basically created this painting for the purpose of illustrations. There was no hidden meaning behind this painting. It is only a representation of one Greek myth. Though it was also created to show the possible beauty of the fountain which was formed from Pirene herself and to show it’s use. It was originally a place for a Pegasus to drink but in the painting, humans were the ones there.


This is a magnificent painting! The possible criteria fitted for this is: Theme, Effect, Technique and Impact. With that, I give 9 points for his choice of topic; 10 points for the marvelous effect; 10 points for the most unique technique I’ve ever seen and 9 for the Impact.


I find this painting very attractive for it’s lighting. The way Parrish used his technique for this artwork was worth it. It can give a lasting effect to the viewers. The title of the work is perfect because it says it all. This painting is calm yet lively in some ways.


A wonderful artwork!

The Persistence of Memory

Our arts teacher told us to pick three painting and make an analysis. Here's one of them .. This painting really caught my attention and I know that it has a very deep meaning..



The Persistence of Memory
Painted by Salvador Dali



The title of the artwork is “The Persistence of Memory” by Salvador Dali. This painting was created during the year 1931 using oil on a 9.5 in by 13 in canvas. This is also one of Dali’s well-known painting. 


            This is a surrealist work by Dali that shows melting pocket watches. There are four in the painting. A weird fading creature can be seen at the front. it seems to be duck-like, but has two small eyes at one side and a giant eyelash below the eyes. Anta and flies were present. Platforms were also shown at the front and at the back. Snow at the back while a sand-like surface at the front. At the back, yellow rock formations can be seen. Lastly, a different colored sky can be noticed as the overall background.


Dali used a lot of different forms for the painting. There was no similarities between the lines too. The axis is undoubtedly horizontal. Also, round and irregular shapes were used. Both light and dark colors were present, but cool colors were more dominant. For the texture, it has a hardness and softness effect.


The use of lines for the painting made it very mysterious. For that, the intensity of the painting is big especially when you add up the colors used and shading. Proper spacing was not visible; everything is scattered and the picture has dull moments.


Emphasis was not given, everything can be seen of equal importance with the other. The painting is not balanced; the left side has more weight than the right. The left side has more spaces. There was no harmony, each object does not connect with the other. Some also overlap. Variety is very visible; different shapes, forms and texture was shown. The movement is quite complicated; it looks still yet not. There is rhythm is present but low; this is due to the shading and lighting. Proportions is very disturbed and no unity. There is a depth in it.


Salvador Dali used surrealism as his technique. This is proven becsuse the artwork  featured the element of surprise and unexpected juxtapositions. He also exposed psychological truth by stripping ordinary objects of their normal significance, in order to create a compelling image that was beyond ordinary formal organization.


He created this painting to show that things appear strong and always purposeful but there will come a point where they fade away and become somewhat useless. Dali also admitted that his idea came from hallucinations. He said drugs and dream are his driving forces.

In his painting, pocket watches were melting on a branch and on the rocks. This is a bit deceiving to some. The reason for that is the fact that it is fantasy but it was placed over a life-like setting. It can be interpreted that hard objects can become limp in a n infinite dreamscape.


There was also this uncommon creature lying in the sand --- looking lifeless. Some art historians say that it actually has Dali’s face. Meaning, he pictured himself somewhat peaceful and yet lost with no concept of time to keep him going forward.


It was revealed too, that the cliff at the back is actually real. It can be seen in Catalonia, the place he grew up. Something interesting can be seen too, the ants. They were painted to the melting watch. It shows that it is decaying. As what they’ve said “…..like a rotting flesh”


Overall, what Dali wants to say is that no matter the lack of time, things will come to an end somehow.


“An eye-catching painting,” is what I’ll call it. At first glance, a lot of people will be fascinated by this artwork. It is very unique. It can also be interpreted in a lot of ways. Looking t it will make the viewer more curious as he/she interprets it. It has a very deep meaning even though it has no balance, proportions and unity. I am very puzzled of the title. If a person looks into it, he/she might give a title related to time of puzzle. Yet, Dali named it with the use of the word “memory”.


For the criteria, it’s suited to be: Meaning, Theme, Uniqueness and Impact. For the Meaning, I give it a 10 because it has different form of it; I give it a 9 for the theme for it is not common and it is very interesting; Uniqueness—I give it a 9 and lastly, I give ten for the Impact --- it is really attractive in a lot of ways.

Mysterious yet magnificent!

Argument of the Scientists

When we were in high school, we were tasked to do a play about scientists. This is an excerpt of what a friend of mine,  wrote in the script. This was the highlight of our play so I wanted to present it. Credit goes to my friend.. By the way, this is fiction. 

The Scientists



Argument Scene

Kevin: Rectifying science with religion has been my life dream. I hoped to prove that science and religion are two actually compatible fields – two different approaches to finding the same truth. And recently . . . I conceived a way to do that.

Assistant Scientist: He devised an experiment one had hoped would settle one of the most bitter argument in the history of science and religion.

Galileo: Creationism

Aristotle: The Bible states that God created the universe.

Newton: And God said, “Let there be light”? and everything we see appeared out of vast emptiness. Unfortunately, one of the fundamentals of physics states that matter cannot be created out of nothing.

Sagan: That contradicts the accepted law of modern physics. Genesis is scientifically absurd!

Kevin: Scientists, I assume that you are familiar with the Big Bang Theory?

Assistant Scientist: According to the theory, a single point of intensely focused energy erupted in a cataclysmic explosion, expanding outward to form a universe.

Sagan: Sadly, the theory have one serious flow.

Kevin: The singularity. The exact moment of creation. Time Zero.

Kaku: But even today, science cannot grasp the initial time of creation.

Aristotle: And this church holds up this problem as a proof of God’s miraculous involvement.

Kevin: I believe in God’s involvement in Big Bang Theory. I want science to support the concept of Religion. I want to prove that Genesis is possible.

Einstein: Create universe out of nothing at all! Impossible!

Kevin: Better said . . . recreated the Big Bang Theory.

All scientist: But HOW?

Assistant Scientist: We accelerated two ultrathin particle in opposite direction around the accelerator tube. The two will eventually collide at enormous speed , compressing all their energy into a single new energy.

Kevin: Inside the accelerator, at the highly point of energy, particles of another matter appeared.

Einstein: Then it proves that Genesis and Creation can be explained by accepting the presence of an enormous source of energy.

Galileo: You mean God?

Kevin: God, Yahweh, the unified point –call it whatever you like – the result is the same, science and religion support the same truth – pure energy is the Father of Creation.

Galileo: And in those canisters are specimens of the matter he created?

Kevin: Actually, this is unique. Another type of matter.

Aristotle: What? There is only one matter . . . simple matter . . .

Kevin: What does the Bible say about the creation?

Aristotle: God created light and dark, heaven and hell . . .

Kevin: Exactly! He created everything in symmetry. Perfect balance.

Kaku: Like in my M-theory or Parallel worlds. Science claims that the Big Bang created everything in the universe with the opposite. Protons and electrons, up-quarks and down-quarks.

Sagan: Including matter itself.

Kevin: Scientists you are looking at world’s first ANTI-MATTER!

(all scientists got amazed)

Galileo: The duality. Fact of nature.

Newton: How did you contain it?

Sagan: Anti-matter cannot touch any matter … even air. Energetically speaking, anti-matter is the mirror image of matter, so the two instantly cancel each other if they come in contact, an annihilation.

Kaku: Large amounts of energy will be released. An explotion just like Big Bang Theory.

Kevin: We built a polarity vacuum and applied the magnetic field.

Newton: Matter arched right, and anti-matter arched left.

Kevin: Therefore, anti-matter is suspended from the canister. Here I will show you the Annihilation , the energy of Anti matter, the Genesis . . . (off magnetic field)

(a brilliant point of light emerged, then in an instant rushed back inward.)

J Music

This a research I made when I was in high school. I already rephrased most of the content. The sources are stated below. I also know that a lot of people are also in love with Japanese Music. 

INTRODUCTION

- - - Japanese Ongaku - - -

Japanese music can be called “ongaku”. It is combined by the kanji words “on” which means sound and “gaku” which means fun or comfort.

Japanese music has both traditional and folk which consists of Biwa hōshi, Heike biwa, mōsō, and goze ; Taiko ; Min'yō folk music ; and Okinawan folk music. It also has different kinds of musical instruments like string which has both plucked and bowed; wind which has flutes,   reeded instruments, free reed mouth organs and Horns; and percussion which has drums and other types of percussion instruments.

Japanese ongaku also has its own style and it consists of a variety of performers but it was influenced by some countries. China and other Western countries were a few of them.

After it was influenced by Western music it already had art music which comprise of western classical and jazz ; popular music which is made up of  Japanese Rock music ; Folk music ; Japanese Hip-Hop ; Roots music ; Latin, reggae and ska music ; Noise music ; Theme music ; and Game music.


EVENT

A lot of cultural influences entered Japan when regular trade routes in mainland Asia opened up. This trade routes opened during the Kofun period. This lead to the spread of Buddhism and it also contributed a lot for the Chinese to influence Japan’s culture. It really influenced its music and instruments.



MODES OF INFLUENCE


Chinese music besides Western music also influenced Japanese music. It contributed in both it’s traditional music and it’s instruments.


- - - Japan’s Traditional Music - - -


Japan has three types of traditional music. One is instrumental Nagauta, Shakuhachi music and Sōkyoku. Second is theatrical. It is made up of Kabuki and Noh. Third is court music. It comprises of Gagaku, Shomyo and  Jōruri.

Some of these traditional music are influenced by Chinese music. These are:

1. Gagaku

- Gagaku is a court music. It is made up of songs, dances and other mixtures of Asian music. It has instrumental and vocal music.

    Instrumental:
       * Kangen – this is basically a Chinese form of music.
    * Bugaku – this is influenced by Chinese and Korean music.

2. Sōkyoku

- this instrumental traditional music uses the Chinese koto( or guzheng ).This is different from Japanese koto. 


- - - Japan’s Musical Instruments - - -

Traditional Japanese music is influenced by Chinese music because some of the musical instruments used in it came from China.

These are some list of the instruments:

1. Biwa
Infos:  * It is a Japanese short-necked fretted lute.
           * It is a close variant of the Chinese pipa.
           * It is the chosen instrument of Benten, goddess of music, eloquence, poetry, and
              education in Japanese Shinto

History: This instrument reached Japan from China during the Nara Period (710-759 AD), and five instruments from that time are kept in the Shōsōin, the national treasure house of Japan. One of them, a rare, five-stringed gogenbiwa decorated with Central Asian themes, including a camel.

2. Fue

Infos: * It is Japanese for flute.
          * It is generally high-pitched.
          * It is made of a bamboo called shinobue.

History: The earliest fue may have developed from pitch pipes called paixiao in Chinese. The gabachi instruments eventually made its way over to Japan from China in the fifth century, becoming prevalent during the Nara Period.


3. Hichiriki
Infos: * It is a double reed Japanese fue (flute).
          * It used as one of two main melodic instruments in Japanese gagaku music.
          * It is one of the "sacred" instruments and is often heard being played at Shinto
          weddings in Japan.

History: It is derived from the Chinese guan or bili, and is also related to the Korean piri.

4. Kakko

Infos: * It is a Japanese double-headed drum.
          * They are usually laid on their sides on stands so that it can be played with sticks called
           bachi on both heads.
          * It is used in taiko ensembles, but they are also used in older Japanese court music called
           gagaku.

History: It is derived from the Chinese jiegu, a drum popular in China during the Tang Dynasty, as is the Korean galgo.

5.  Kokyū

Infos: * It is a traditional Japanese string instrument.
         * It is played with a bow.
History: It was introduced to Japan from China along with the shamisen

6. Sanshin

Infos: * It is an Okinawan musical instrument and precursor of the Japanese shamisen.
          * It consists of a snakeskin-covered body, neck and three strings.

History: Its close resemblance in both appearance and name to the Chinese sanxian suggests its Chinese origins, the old Ryūkyū Kingdom (pre-Japanese Okinawa) having very close ties with China. In the 16th century, the sanshin reached the Japanese trading port at Sakai in Osaka, Japan. In mainland Japan, it evolved into the larger shamisen.

7. Shakahuchi

Infos: * It is a Japanese end-blown flute.
          * It is traditionally made of bamboo
          * They are often made in the minor pentatonic scale.

History: The bamboo flute first came to Japan from China. The shakuhachi proper, however, is quite distinct from its Chinese counterpart[1] – the result of centuries of isolated evolution in Japan.

8. Shō

Infos: * It is a Japanese free reed musical instrument.

          * It is consists of 17 slender bamboo pipes.

Hisory: It was introduced from China during the Nara period. It is modeled on the Chinese sheng, although the shō tends to be smaller in size.

9. Taiko

Infos: * It is a Japanese drum that comes in various sizes.

         * It is used to play a variety of musical genres.

History: Its origins are uncertain, but can be sketched out as far back as the 6th and 7th centuries, when a clay figure of a drummer indicates its existence. China influences followed, but

the instrument and its music remained uniquely Japanese.


CONCLUSION


Japan’s music has different styles and it consists of different performers. It’s music and instruments are influenced by China.

It can be seen that there are some similarities if you compare Japan’s instruments from Chinese instruments. Basically, the instruments from Japan came from China. The instruments were mostly introduced during the Nara and Medieval period.

Japan’s music, both traditional and folk are very unique. Though, it was still influenced by a bit of Chinese culture. It can be seen that some of Japan’s music uses the Chinese form of music for different kinds of play.

The Chinese influence really left a mark and an impact on Japan. Not only does it have some similarities in the outer view but it also has similarities in how to play it and how to understand its components.

Influences started due to trading. This event really showed the effect of trading during the early days. 


Sources:

http://www.culturalprofiles.net/japan/directories/japan_cultural_profile/-10586.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_Japanese_music

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_Japanese_musical_instruments